LaBere v. Palmer’s Empirical Analysis
1950
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently April 2019
3 federal appellate · 15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Blankholm v. Fearing · Underhill v. State · State v. Armour & Co. · Hayden v. Lamberton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'not of decisive significance and may not be used to vary the plain import of a statute's explicit language within the scope of the title.' " Wukawitz , 662 N.W.2d at 527 n.8 (quoting La Bere v. Palmer , 232 Minn. 203 , 44 N.W.2d 827 , 829 (1950) ). We do not find the meaning of "released from prison”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Heilman v. Courtney““* * * plaintiff’s right, where his original selection of venue is based on residence pursuant to § 542.095, is limited to those cases where there is only one defendant, or where a majority or all of the defendants actually reside in a single county.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jumer v. Truesdale
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.