Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 232 MINN 266 - State v. End

State v. End’s Empirical Analysis

1950

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
May 2000
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2000 · most notably Waller v. Florida (1970), State v. Soto (1985)

36 state decisions

80195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gooch v. United States · Orme v. Atlas Gas and Oil Co. · State v. Lee · First Nat. Bank of Anamoose v. United States · Anderson v. Burnquist

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) wilfully [sic] and lewdly exposing the person, or the private parts thereof, in any public place, or in any place where others are present (the offense charged in the information here and the act of indecent exposure for which defendant was previously convicted under the ordinance); (2) procuring another to so expose himself; (3) open or gross lewdness or lascivious behavior; and (4) any public indecency other than hereinbefore specified.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “When the words of a law in their application to an existing situation are clear and free from all ambiguity, the letter of the law shall not be disregarded under the pretext of pursuing the spirit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.