¶1The defendant was convicted in the circuit court of Reynolds county on May 29, 1910, on an information charging him with having carnal knowledge of one Ida Speer, an unmarried female, between the ages of fourteen and eighteen years, of previous chaste character. The record proper shows that this was the.second conviction of the defendant in this case.
¶2The defendant filed a plea in bar, reciting a prior conviction herein on the 25th day of November, 1909, and an appeal from the judgment on such conviction; and while the plea in bar is not preserved in the bill of exceptions, it is alleged by the defendant and admitted by the Attorney-General that this is the same case in which a judgment and conviction in the trial court, rendered on the 25th day of November, 1900', was affirmed by this court at its present term.
¶3*252As will be seen by our first opinion herein filed, we have found that the action of the trial court in awarding defendant a new trial of its own motion after it had granted him an appeal to this court and had approved his appeal bond, was unauthorized and without warrant of law. Ve are of the opinion that all the proceedings in this cause had in the circuit court of Reynolds county after the granting of the first, appeal on the 25th day of November, 1909, are'illegal.
¶4The judgment of the circuit court of Reynolds county, entered on the 31st day of May, 1910, adjudging the defendant guilty, and assessing his punishment at a fine of five hundred dollars, and three months’ imprisonment in the county jail, is therefore reversed.