Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

232 N.C. 518

61 S.E.2d 335

Jones v. Jones

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 18, 1950

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1950-10-18

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently November 1968

14 state decisions

Relies on Salley v. Fayetteville Coca-Cola Bottling Co. · Pruitt v. . Wood · State v. . Watson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1950-10-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

BabNhill, J.

¶1 This cause was beard at the January Term, 1950, Catawba Superior Court, and the judge entered judgment on 27 January 1950. At the same time, the cause having been disposed of on the record, the court fixed the case on appeal and also allowed time in which to serve the same. the appeal reached the office of the Clerk of this Court 30 March 1950, after the Spring Term call of cases from the Sixteenth District. the Clerk of this Court was authorized or directed to docket the appeal for the Fall Term 1950. Appellants’ brief was filed 29 September 1950. On this showing, the appeal must be dismissed.

¶2 The judge fixed the case on appeal at the time judgment was entered. Service thereof was not required. Privette v. Allen, 227 N.C. 164, 41 S.E. 2d 364.

¶3 It was the duty of appellants to docket their appeal at the Spring Term 1950 of this Court, fourteen days before the call of the docket of the Sixteenth District to which this case belongs. Rule 5, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 221 N.C. 546.

¶4 This rule is mandatory and cannot be abrogated by consent or otherwise. Pruitt v. Wood, 199 N.C. 788, 156 S.E. 126. Failure to docket as thus required results in the loss of the right of appeal and necessitates dismissal. Pruitt v. Wood, supra; S. v. Watson, 208 N.C. 70; 179 S.E. 455; S. v. Presnell, 226 N.C. 160, 36 S.E. 2d 927.

¶5 This disposition of the appeal is not due to arbitrariness on our part but is in the enforcement of a rule essential to the prompt administration of justice. Pruitt v. Wood, supra. We may note, however, that, on this record, the dismissal of the appeal works no injury to any of the parties. Whatever the procedure which might be adopted in the trial of this cause in the court below, the final result would be the same.

¶6 Appeal dismissed.

/232/nc/518 · .json · Public domain