Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

232 N.C. 729

62 S.E.2d 336

Craig v. Craig

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 29, 1950

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1950-11-29

Relies on Young Men's Christian Ass'n of Columbus Ohio v. Davis · Buffaloe v. . Barnes

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1950-11-29

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently March 2003

12 state decisions

40195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

*730 Per Curiam.

¶1 Defendants appealed from tbe ruling of the court below on facts agreed that the Federal Estate tax paid by the executrix of David I. Craig was chargeable to the residuary estate, and that the executrix had no right to reimbursement from the beneficiaries under the will for their proportionate part of the tax so paid.

¶2 This ruling is supported by the holding of this Court in Buffaloe v. Barnes, 226 N.C. 313, 38 S.E. 2d 222, and is in accord with the weight of authority in other jurisdictions. 28 A.J. 136; 142 A.L.R. 1137. No contrary testamentary provision appears in the will. In Y.M.C.A. v. Davis, 264 U.S. 47, it was said: “What was being imposed here (by Congress) was an excise upon the transfer of an estate upon death of the owner. It was not a tax upon succession and receipt of benefits under the law or the will. It was death duties as distinguished from a legacy or succession tax. What this law taxes is not the interest to which the legatees and devisees succeeded on death, but the interest which ceased by reason of the death.”

¶3 Judgment affirmed.

JOHNSON, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
/232/nc/729 · .json · Public domain