Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 232 N.C. App. 256 - State v. Lee

232 N.C. App. 256 - State v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Guffey · 61 N.C. App. 531 - State v. Williamson · 83 N.C. App. 143 - State v. Monroe · 198 N.C. App. 154 - State v. Hubbard · State v. Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]hen a criminal charge is pending in a court of competent jurisdiction, which charge is the sole basis for activating a previously suspended sentence, such sentence should not be activated unless there is a conviction on the pending charge or there is a plea of guilty entered thereto.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “on notice that the State [is] alleging a revocation-eligible violation[.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “the violation report specifically alleged that [the] defendant violated the condition of probation that he commit no criminal offense in that he had several new pending charges which were specifically identified”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.