State v. Sanders’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 2014
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Roberts · 175 N.C. App. 250 - State v. Hanton · 180 N.C. App. 286 - State v. Key · 6 N.C. App. 365 - State v. Hill · 201 N.C. App. 662 - State v. Fortney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) Adults or minors who are current or former spouses; (2) Adults or minors who live together or who have lived together; (3) Adults or minors who are dating or who have dated or who have or had a sexual relationship, but does not include fraternization between two (2) individuals in a business or social context; (4) Adults or minors related by blood or adoption; (5) Adults or minors who are related or were formerly related by marriage; or (6) Adult or minor children of a person in a relationship that is described in subdivisions (a)(l)-(5).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sanders“[i]f the State proves by the preponderance of the evidence that an offense classified as a misdemeanor in the other jurisdiction is substantially similar to an offense classified as a Class A1 or Class 1 misdemeanor in North Carolina, the conviction is treated as a Class A1 or Class 1 misdemeanor for assigning prior record level points.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sanders
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.