Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 232 N.C. App. 637 - State v. Carpenter

232 N.C. App. 637 - State v. Carpenter’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
August 2025
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Lawrence · State v. Bass · State v. Whiteside · 78 N.C. App. 493 - State v. Knox · State v. Scott

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As a general proposition, claims of ineffective assistance of counsel should be considered through motions for appropriate relief and not on direct appeal. It is well established that ineffective assistance of counsel claims brought on direct review will be decided on the merits when the cold record reveals that no further investigation is required, i.e., claims that may be developed and argued without such ancillary procedures as the appointment of investigators or an evidentiary hearing. Thus, when this Court reviews ineffective assistance of counsel claims on direct appeal and determines that they have been brought prematurely, we dismiss those claims without prejudice, allowing defendants to bring them pursuant to a subsequent motion for appropriate relief in the trial court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “all evidence offered against a party involves some prejudicial effect, the fact that evidence is prejudicial does not mean that it is necessarily unfairly prejudicial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “State v. Capers , 208 N.C. App. 605 , 617, 704 S.E.2d 39 , 46 (2010) (citation omitted).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.