Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

232 Neb. 236

439 N.W.2d 796

Dilsaver v. Dilsaver

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1989

Nebraska Supreme Court · decided 1989-05-19

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 1989

3 state decisions

Relies on Griffith v. Griffith · Staman v. Staman · Shaffer v. Shaffer

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1989-05-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1 The sole issue on appeal in this dissolution of marriage action is the custody of the two minor children of the parties. After finding that both parties were fit and proper parents, the trial court granted custody of the children, ages 3V2 and IV2 at the *237 time of trial in September 1988, to the appellee father, subject to visitation in the appellant mother.

¶2 We have held that determinations as to the custody of and visitation with minor children in a dissolution of marriage case are matters initially entrusted to the discretion of the trial judge, whose determinations, on appeal, will be reviewed de novo on the record and affirmed in the absence of an abuse of the trial judge’s discretion; keeping in mind, however, that the trial judge observed and heard the witnesses and accepted one version of the facts rather than the other. Shaffer v. Shaffer, 231 Neb. 910, 438 N.W.2d 507 (1989); Griffith v. Griffith, 230 Neb. 314, 431 N.W.2d 609 (1988); Staman v. Staman, 225 Neb. 864, 408 N.W.2d 320 (1987).

¶3 We have so reviewed this case. We determine that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion. The judgment is affirmed.

¶4 Affirmed.

/232/neb/236 · .json · Public domain