Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 232 Neb. 584 - Earl v. Priority Key Services, Inc.

Earl v. Priority Key Services, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jones v. JOHNSON MACH. & PRESS CO., ETC. · Nielsen v. Adams · Bock v. Bank of Bellevue · Armour-Dial, Inc. v. Alkar Engineering Corp. · Selection Research, Inc. v. Murman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) A representation was made; (2) the representation was false; (3) when the representation was made, it was known to be false or was made recklessly without knowledge of its truth and as a positive assertion; (4) the representation was made with the intention that it would be relied upon; (5) there was reliance upon the representation; and (6) damages occurred as a result.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.