Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 232 Neb. 742 - Huffman v. Huffman

Huffman v. Huffman’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

87
cited by 87 later decisions
3
states following
January 2021
most recently cited

87 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 87 later decisions — most recently January 2021 · most notably Ritter v. Ritter (1990), Knox v. Cook (1989)

87 state decisions

76019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Boisen v. Petersen Flying Service, Inc. · Ensrud v. Ensrud · Newton v. Brown · Bump v. Firemens Ins. Co. of Newark, NJ · Loudenslager Will

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 87 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In an appeal involving an action for dissolution of marriage, the Supreme Court’s review of a trial court’s judgment is de novo on the record to determine whether there has been an abuse of discretion by the trial judge, whose judgment will be upheld in the absence of an abuse of discretion. In such de novo review, when the evidence is in conflict, the Supreme Court considers, and may give weight to, the fact that the trial judge heard and observed the witnesses and accepted one version of the facts rather than another.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Regarding a question of law, an appellate court has an obligation to reach a conclusion independent from a trial court's conclusion in a judgment under review.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.