State v. Cruz’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 1991
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Bibby v. United States · Kelly v. Robinson · State v. Roth · State v. Yarbough
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] determination of whether there has been an increase in the period of detention should be made by comparing defendant’s existing aggregate maximum sentence with the maximum base determinate sentence imposed at resentencing. It is the outer limit of the aggregate term of imprisonment or supervision imposed at the resentencing which determines whether the Code sentence exceeds the 2A sentence. This is so because in a Gerald resentencing, the prior (Title 2A) sentencing slate is wiped clean except for the outer limit fixed by the maximum range of the Title 2A sentence. [Id. at 299, 556 A. d 1295.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Cruz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.