232 Or. App. 563 - Umberger v. Czerniak’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 district ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “the rule regarding expert testimony as to a diagnosis of child sexual abuse was exemplified in State v. Wilson , 121 Or. App. 460 , 465-66, 855 P.2d 657 [ (1993) ].”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. White v. Nooth

2. “not precluded from testifying as to her medical diagnosis simply because the jury may infer from that testimony that another witness is or is not telling the truth.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. White v. Nooth

3. “Although, if believed, Bays' testimony supported the child's testimony, that does not render it a direct comment on the child's credibility.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. White v. Nooth