Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 232 Or. App. 567 - State v. Cervantes

232 Or. App. 567 - State v. Cervantes’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'Recklessly,' when used with respect to a result or to a circumstance described by a statute defining an offense, means that a person is aware of and consciously disregards a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the result will occur or that the circumstance exists. The risk must be of such nature and degree that disregard thereof constitutes a gross deviation from the standard of care that a reasonable person would observe in the situation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “prohibits conduct that is likely to expose another person to harm; it is not limited to conduct that actually exposes another person to harm.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “the relevant harm need only be possible or potential.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.