232 Or. App. 567 - State v. Cervantes’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'Recklessly,' when used with respect to a result or to a circumstance described by a statute defining an offense, means that a person is aware of and consciously disregards a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the result will occur or that the circumstance exists. The risk must be of such nature and degree that disregard thereof constitutes a gross deviation from the standard of care that a reasonable person would observe in the situation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“prohibits conduct that is likely to expose another person to harm; it is not limited to conduct that actually exposes another person to harm.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“the relevant harm need only be possible or potential.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.