Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 232 P3D 155 - People v. Lucas

People v. Lucas’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
April 2020
most recently cited

27 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Blockburger v. United States · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Gregg v. Georgia · Oregon v. Elstad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “€œWhen a fragmented Court decides a case and no single rationale explaining the result enjoys the assent of five Justices, the holding of the Court may be viewed as that position taken by those Members who concurred in the judgments on the narrowest grounds.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “€œWe review jury instructions de novo to determine whether the instructions . . . accurately informed the jury of the governing law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[P ]redicate offenses are those for which all of the elements must be proved in order to sustain a conviction for a greater offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.