Charles v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 16 U.S.C. § 3112 · 16 U.S.C. § 3114 · 16 U.S.C. § 3124
Relies on Petersen v. Mutual Life Insuarance Co. of New York · State v. First National Bank of Anchorage · Totemoff v. State · Meier v. State, Board of Fisheries · Vigue v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[mJanag-ing game for subsistence and other competing uses is a complex task that requires considerable expertise”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Phillip v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.