Burnside v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

6 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(B) The court may terminate the rights of a parent to a child based upon the following legal grounds: 5. A finding that: a. the parent has failed to correct the condition which led to the deprived adjudication of the child, and b. the parent has been given at least three (3) months to correct the condition; [[Image here]] 14. A finding that: a. the condition that led to the deprived adjudication has been the subject of a previous deprived adjudication of this child or a sibling of this child, and b. the parent has been given an opportunity to correct the conditions which led to the determination of the initial deprived child.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Albert

2. “We reject Mother's claim that the trial court's order must precisely detail each of the conditions that was not corrected. No Oklahoma Supreme Court case mandates such detail. In any event, Mother was provided with sufficient notice of the specific conditions that she was required to correct in the court approved ISP. We hold the ISP constituted sufficient notice of the conditions that required correcting to satisfy due process.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Albert