Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 232 Pa. Super. 339 - Commonwealth v. Williams

232 Pa. Super. 339 - Commonwealth v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
December 1982
most recently cited

19 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Mapp v. Ohio · Linkletter v. Walker · Commonwealth v. Futch · Commonwealth v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The second situation is where the appellate decision is filed after the conviction but before the conviction has become final, i.e., either the time for taking an appeal from the conviction has not expired, or an appeal has been taken but has not yet been decided. In this situation a true question of retroactivity is not presented, and in reviewing the conviction the court may apply the new rule announced by the appellate decision.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.