Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 232 PASUPER 523 - Commonwealth v. Jenkins

Commonwealth v. Jenkins’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
March 1994
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently March 1994

17 state decisions

140197519801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Wade · Stovall v. Denno · Gilbert v. California · Kirby v. Illinois · Balistrieri v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “First the hearing judge must determine whether the accused was entitled to counsel, and, if so, whether that right was recognized, and whether the identification procedure was impermissibly suggestive. . . . Next the hearing judge must determine the admissibility of the in-court identification. Commonwealth v. Jenkins, supra, 232 Pa.Super. at 527 , 335 A.2d at 465 (citations omitted).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.