Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 232 SO2D 767 - York v. State

York v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently January 2019

11 state decisions

60196919701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 224 So. 2d 300 - State v. Wright · 187 So. 2d 890 - State Ex Rel. Faircloth v. District Court of Appeal, Third District · Gilbert v. State · Peel v. State · 154 So. 2d 327 - San Fratello v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"... If such objection were approved as sufficient, it would enable counsel to cloak and conceal a meritorious objection from the trial court which, had it been revealed with specificity, would have allowed the trial court to eliminate the objection and possible error. Used in this fashion the adroit defendant could build error into the record and so have insurance against an unfavorable verdict. Busy trial judges have enough to do in attempting to conduct trials in accordance with law without having to play guessing games with counsel as to the true basis and nature of their objections. We hazard that had counsel given the trial court anything like the same opportunity that he has given this court to learn the nature of his objection, then surely the matter would have been remedied and this facet of the appeal eliminated."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.