Carr v. Carr’s Empirical Analysis
1950
Citation profile
25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently October 2001 · most notably State v. Byrd (1984), Simon v. Simon (1952)
25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bostwick v. Allen · Nelson v. Jones · Maier v. Brock · Osmak v. American Car & Foundry Co. · Jackson v. Phalen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Defendant, who asserted the invalidity of his marriage to plaintiff, had the burden of proof upon the issue, even though the issue required proof of a negative fact difficult to prove. . . . And where a valid first marriage has been shown, as in the instant case, it may be presumed that, at the time of the second marriage, the first marriage had been dissolved, either by a decree of divorce, or by the death of the former spouse.... The presumption of the validity of the last marriage may be repelled only by the most cogent and satisfactory evidence .... ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““The law does not impose upon every person contracting a second marriage the necessity of preserving the evidence that the former marriage has been dissolved either by death of their former consort or by a decree of court, in order to protect themselves against a bill for a divorce.... “The presumption of the validity of the last marriage may be repelled only by the most cogent and satisfactory evidence.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lucas v. Lucas“pending plaintiff's release of claim to the personalty and her relinquishment of her inchoate dower interest in the described realty the title to which is vested in defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Carr v. Carr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.