Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 232 S.W.3d 1 - State v. Strode

State v. Strode’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Atkins v. Virginia · Arizona v. Rumsey · Sattazahn v. Pennsylvania · State v. Odom · Owens v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) Significantly subaverage general intellectual functioning as evidenced by a functional intelligence quotient (I.Q.) of seventy (70) or below; (2) Deficits in adaptive behavior; and (3) The intellectual disability must have been manifested during the developmental period, or by eighteen (18) years of age.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The determination of the trier of fact that the defendant is not mentally retarded shall not be appealable by interlocutory appeal, but may be a basis of appeal by either the state or defendant following the sentencing stage of the trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “it is clear that the Legislature did not intend for the term `developmental period' to extend beyond eighteen years of age.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.