Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 232 S.W.3d 228 - Cooley v. State

Cooley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 179th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Montgomery v. State · Ex Parte Rubac · Ex Parte Vasquez · Ludwig v. State · Ex Parte Willman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. The bail shall be sufficiently high to give reasonable assurance that the undertaking will be complied with. 2. The power to require bail is not to be so used as to make it an instrument of oppression. 3. The nature of the offense and the circumstances' under which it was committed are to be considered. 4. The ability to make bail is to be regarded, and proof may be taken upon this point. 5. The future safety of a victim of the alleged offense and the community shall be considered.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.