Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

232 S.W.3d 609

Brown v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 4, 2007

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2007-09-04

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently May 2016

1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relies on Tillman v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2007-09-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2 Gregory Lamont Brown (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 1 motion for postconviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s findings, conclusions, and judgment are not clearly erroneous. Tillman v. State, 939 S.W.2d 388, 389 (Mo.App. E.D.1996). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

¶3 . All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2006, unless otherwise indicated.

/232/sw3d/609 · .json · Public domain