Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 232 S.W.3d 774 - Kallam v. Boyd

Kallam v. Boyd’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
October 2013
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth))

Relationships

Relies on Yee v. City of Escondido · Lytle v. Household Manufacturing, Inc. · Horizon/CMS Healthcare Corporation v. Auld · Bala v. Maxwell · Boyd v. Kallam

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “legal obligation”). 27 . See Medina v. Herrera, 927 S.W.2d 597, 604 (Tex.1996). 28 . Keck, 20 S.W.3d at 695-96 . 29 . See Int’l Proteins Corp. v. Ralston-Purina Co., 744 S.W.2d 932, 934 (Tex.1988) (assignment of claims to joint tortfeasor prohibited); Beech Aircraft Corp. v. Jinkins, 739 S.W.2d 19, 22 (Tex.1987) (contribution claim by settling tortfeasor against non-settling parties prohibited). 30 . See Mid-Continent Ins. Co. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 236 S.W.3d 765, 774 (Tex.2007). 31 . See Kallam v. Boyd, 232 S.W.3d 774, 776 (Tex.2007) ("We believe prudence dictates awaiting a case in which this important issue has been fully litigated below ‘so that we will have the benefit of developed arguments on both sides and lower court opinions squarely addressing the question.’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “expert” who may prepare an "expert report,” see id. § 74.35l(r)(5), but ap-pellees have not disputed that White meets those standards here. . Id. § 74.351(1). . The Heberts acknowledge that Richard's death during the pendency of this appeal may have terminated his open-courts claim. "[W]rongful-death and survival claimants cannot establish an open-courts violation because they 'have no common law right to bring either.’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.