United States v. Harriet Goelet’s Empirical Analysis
232 U.S. 293 · 1914
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions (10 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1949 · most notably United States v. Lovett (1946), Blodgett v. Holden (1927)
6 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Second Circuit Court of Appeals)
Relationships
Relies on Eidman v. Martinez · Woodward Co. v. Hurd · Seim v. Hurd
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“permanently resident and domiciled in a foreign country.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cook v. Tait“permanent domicile in a foreign country.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cook v. Tait
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.