Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 232 U.S. 371 - Fugurul v. Rivera

Fugurul v. Rivera’s Empirical Analysis

232 U.S. 371 · 1914

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
1
states following
July 1961
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 6 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently July 1961 · most notably Napa Valley Electric Co v. Board of Railroad Com'rs of California (1920), Detroit Mackinac Railway Company v. Michigan Railroad Commission (1914)

18 federal appellate · 6 district · 3 state decisions

180191419201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. California & Oregon Land Co. · Northern Pacific Railway Company v. Jacob Slaght · Tiaco v. Forbes · Burnet v. Desmornes y Alvarez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““But these differing allegations are simply different means to reach the same result — the possession by Ramon of the rights of a natural son; and the evidence offered in this case like the allegations in the former one was only of private acts. In these circumstances the true principle has been declared by this court to he that a judgment or decree bars all grounds for the relief sought. • Northern P. R. Co. v. Slaght, 205 U. S. 122 , 130, 131, 51 L. Ed. 738 , 741, 27 S. Ct. 442 ; United States v. California & O. Land Co., 192 U. S. 355 , 358, 48 L. Ed. 476 , 478, 24 S. Ct. 266 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.