Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 232 U.S. 602 - Young v. Central Railroad

Young v. Central Railroad’s Empirical Analysis

232 U.S. 602 · 1914

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
February 1957
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1957

10 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

7019141920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedCentral R. Co. of New Jersey v. Young (from Third Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Slocum v. New York Life Insurance · Central R. Co. of New Jersey v. Young

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We shall not undertake to analyze the evidence or review the grounds which led the court below to conclude that error was committed in submitting the case to the jury, because we think it is adequate to say that after a careful examination of the record, we see no reason for holding that the court below erred in so holding. As regards, however, the ruling on the motion for judgment non obstante veredicto, it is apparent, in view of the recent decision in Slocum v. Insurance Co., 228 U. S. 364 , that error was committed. It follows that our duty is * * * to affirm the judgment of reversal and to modify by reversing so much of the action of the court below as directed a judgment in favor of the defendant.” Young etc. v. Central Railroad Company of New Jersey, 232 U. S. 602 ( 34 S. Ct. 451 , 58 L. Ed. 750 ).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.