Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 232 U.S. 78 - Anna Lapina v. William Williams

Anna Lapina v. William Williams’s Empirical Analysis

232 U.S. 78 · 1914

Citation profile

231
cited by 231 later decisions
37
cited 37 times by the Supreme Court
9
states following
June 1975
most recently cited

89 federal appellate · 39 district · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 231 later decisions (37 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1975 · most notably Caminetti v. United States (1917), Ng Fung Ho v. White (1922)

89 federal appellate · 39 district · 16 state decisions

7301914192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Second Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Rector Etc of Holy Trinity Church v. United States · United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Ass'n · Johnson v. Southern Pacific Co. · Nishimura Ekiu v. United States · Chae Chan Ping v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 231 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The authority of Congress over the general subject-matter is plenary; it may exclude aliens altogether, or prescribe the terms and conditions upon which they may come into or remain in this country. * * * The question, therefore, is not the power of Congress, but its intent and purpose as expressed in legislation.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “for the purpose of prostitution or for any other immoral purpose”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.