Ex Parte Pollard’s Empirical Analysis
1936
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 1956
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ex parte Tower Manufacturing Co. · Collins v. Mobile O. R. Co. · Ex Parte Nolen · Culver v. Alabama Midland Railway Co. · Sibley v. Hutchison
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Answers predicated on ‘information’ obtained from others would be purely hearsay, and not admissible as evidence; hence such information is not within the influence of the statute.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex parte Markle
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.