Mazander v. Reed’s Empirical Analysis
1961
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently May 1980
4 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Arkansas Valley Compress & Warehouse Co. v. Morgan · ARKANSAS VALLEY COMPRESS & WREHSE. CO. v. Morgan · Welch v. Farber · Stuttgart Rice Mill Co. v. Lockridge
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the intentional and successful employment of any cunning, deception, or artifice, used to circumvent, cheat, or deceive another,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bishop v. Tice
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.