Mitchell v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1961
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently December 2000 · most notably Johnson v. Johnson (2000), Lonnie Mitchell v. Dan D. Stephens, Superintendent of Arkansas State Penitentiary (1965)
4 federal appellate · 24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Brown v. Allen · Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCann · Frank v. Mangum · Sunal v. Large
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““2. Petitioner avers and verily believes that he was insane at the time of the commission of the offense for which he is now convicted. “3. Petitioner avers and verily believes that not only was he insane at the time of the crime for which he was convicted and is now committed, bnt that he was insane at the time of the trial wherein he was convicted and sentenced to death, and further that he is presently insane. “4. Petitioner did not have a mental examination prior to his trial, and has been repeatedly refused permission to have a private psychiatrist examine him, and Petitioner honestly feels that a mental examination by a private psychiatrist is absolutely necessary so as to afford appellant an opportunity to be heard. ‘ ‘ 5. Petitioner’s insanity was not known at the time of the trial, 1 and such fact was not then suggested, 2 or raised in issue by either of the parties hereto; Petitioner avers that he did not have the mental capacity to so apprise the trial court of his mental condition. ‘ ‘ 6. That no other remedy is available to Petitioner to review and inquire into the question of his insanity at the time that the crime was committed, and also as to his insanity at the time of the trial, except the remedy as provided by a writ of error coram nobis.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mitchell v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.