Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 233 Ark. 586 - Haville v. Pearrow

Haville v. Pearrow’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
October 1980
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently October 1980

18 state decisions

100196119701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on O'Neal v. B. F. Goodrich Rubber Company · Merriott v. Kilgore · Knights of Maccabees of the World v. Gordon · Chambliss v. Reppy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under the view we take, it is not necessary that we discuss whether the service was valid, for under our holdings, irrespective of the validity of service, the judgment must be affirmed. We have mány times held that before one can successfully set aside a judgment, he must show a meritorious defense. This is in accord with our statutes. Section 29-508 provides that proceedings to vacate judgments or orders under § 29-506 shall be by complaint, verified by affidavit, and shall set forth the judgment or order, grounds to vacate or modify same, and the defense to the action, if the party applying was a defendant. Section 29-509 provides that a judgment shall not be vacated on motion or complaint until it is adjudged that there is a valid defense to the action on which the judgment is rendered.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"(c) The court in which a judgment has been rendered or order made shall have the power, after the expiration of ninety (90) days after the filing of said judgment with the clerk of the court, to vacate or modify such judgment or order: "(7) For unavoidable casualty or misfortune preventing the party from appearing or defending.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.