Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 233 CALRPTR3D 715 - People v. Lee

People v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 9 Cal. 4th 331 - People v. Scott · 17 Cal. 4th 599 - Santisas v. Goodin · Western Security Bank v. Superior Court · 37 Cal. 4th 659 - Kinsman v. Unocal Corp. · 38 Cal. 4th 914 - Carter v. Dept. of Veterans Affairs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “' "it is logical to regard the amendment as a legislative interpretation of the original act-a formal change-rebutting the presumption of substantial change.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Legislature intended merely to clarify the statutory language after a conflict arose in the case law about its meaning”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[n]oneconomic losses, including, but not limited to, psychological harm, for felony violations of Sections 288”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.