Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 233 CONN 403 - State v. Ali

State v. Ali’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

114
cited by 114 later decisions
3
states following
August 2025
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 6 district · 105 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 114 later decisions — most recently August 2025 · most notably State v. Figueroa (1995), State v. Santiago (1998)

3 federal appellate · 6 district · 105 state decisions

5501995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · United States v. Marion · United States v. Lovasco · Frye v. United States · DiCarlantonio v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 114 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[n]o person may be prosecuted for any other offense, except a capital felony, a class A felony or a violation of section 53a-54d , except within one year next after the offense has been committed.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he purpose of a statute of limitations is to ensure a timely commencement of prosecution. . . .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “used the term 'tolled,' as well as other forms of the verb 'toll,' in connection with § 54-193 (b) merely to describe the practical effect of a delay in the execution of an arrest warrant. Of course, in light of the traditional meaning of the term 'toll' within the parlance of statutes of limitations, namely as a synonym for 'suspended'; see Black's Law Dictionary (6th Ed. 1990); a 'prosecution' within the applicable time period satisfies , rather than 'tolls,' the statute of limitations. Only § 54-193 [ (d) ] specifically concerns the tolling of the statute of limitations.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.