Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 233 F.1d 139 - The Oceana

The Oceana’s Empirical Analysis

233 F. 139 · 1916

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
September 1987
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 6 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 1987

4 federal appellate · 6 district ·

7019161920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on The Kate · New York Trust Co. v. Bermuda-Atlantic S. S. Co. · The City of Milford · The Ha Ha · The Thomas W. Rodgers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““There was, of course, no constructive notice by virtue of the filing of the contract of conditional sale in conformity with the state statute. The act of June 23, 1910, expressly supersedes state statutes conferring liens on vessels, and under Rev. St. § 4192 (Comp. St. 1913, § 7778 [46 USCA § 921 note]), there is no constructive notice to anybody unless the bill of sale or conveyance is recorded in the office of the collector of the customs where such vessel is registered or enrolled.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““(5) Until said ship is completely paid for, the purchaser covenants as follows: "(a) To keep said ship clear of any liens from any cause, and If any lien or libel is filed or asserted, the same shall be immediately bonded by -the purchaser. The purchaser agrees to promptly pay current bills for supplies and repairs to said ship, and exhibit at reasonable times the ship’s accounts and bills to seller’s representatives.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““knew, or by the exercise of reasonable diligence could have ascertained, that * * * the person ordering the ~ * * supplies * * * was without authority to bind the vsssel therefor.” Section 3 (section 7785).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.