Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 233 F.2d 551 - Stipa v. Dulles

Stipa v. Dulles’s Empirical Analysis

233 F.2d 551 · 1956

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
November 2003
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently November 2003

10 federal appellate · 1 district ·

70195619601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 6 · 8 U.S.C. § 1481 (§ 349 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1503 (§ 360 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 801

Relies on Schneiderman v. United States · Baumgartner v. United States · Perkins v. Elg · Mandoli v. Acheson · Lehmann v. Acheson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The burden of proving expatriation generally is upon the defendant who affirmatively alleges it and the burden is a ‘heavy’ one. Factual doubts are to be resolved in favor of citizenship. The burden of proof on the government in an expatriation case is like that in denaturalization; the evidence must be clear, unequivocal and convincing. The rule prevailing in denaturalization cases, that ‘the facts and the law should be construed as far as is reasonably possible in favor of the citizen’ equally applies to expatriation cases. American citizenship is not to ‘be lightly taken away.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.