Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 233 F.2d 851 - Powell v. United States

Powell v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

233 F.2d 851 · 1956

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
July 1988
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently July 1988 · most notably Blessing v. United States (1978), Hendry v. United States (1969)

18 federal appellate · 3 district ·

1001956196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2680 · 43 U.S.C. § 315

Relies on United States v. Sherwood · Feres v. United States · Dalehite v. United States · United States v. Yellow Cab Co. · Broadway Open Air Theatre, Inc. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * the district courts * * * shall have exclusive jurisdiction of civil actions * * * for injury or loss of property, or personal injury or death caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of any employee of the Government while acting within the scope of his office or employment, under circumstances where the United States, if a private person, would be liable to the claimant in accordance with the law of the place where the act. or omission occurred * * * >> and”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Standing alone, the statute waived in sweeping language the immunity of the Government to suits for damages for death, personal injury, or injury to property, resulting from negligence on the part of an agent or employee of the Government while acting within the scope of his employment, if under similar circumstances a private individual would be liable under the law of the place where the act or omission occurred • * * * ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Any claim based upon an act or omission of an employee of the Government, exercising due care, in the execution of a statute or regulation, whether or not such statute or regulation be valid, or based upon the exercise or performance or the failure to exercise or perform a discretionary function or duty on the part of a federal agency or an employee of the Government, whether or not the discretion involved be abused.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.