Jay v. Intermet Wagner Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
233 F.3d 1014 · 2000
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently December 2020 · most notably Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. (2005), Hoffman v. Caterpillar, Inc. (2001)
7 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (§ 2 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12111 (§ 101 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Gile v. United Airlines, Inc. · Weiler v. Household Finance Corp. · Donald Rehling v. The City of Chicago, a Municipal Corporation · Feldman v. American Memorial Life Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t is the employer's prerogative to choose a reasonable accommodation; an employer is not required to provide the particular accommodation that an employee requests.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“unreasonable delay in providing an accommodation can provide evidence of discrimination”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.