¶1
NOTE: THE COURT HAS VACATED THIS OPINION. SEE OPINION AT 269 F.3d 305.
233 F.3d 232
Docket No. 99-2389 No. 99-2391 No. 00-1098 No. 00-1432.
Full caption · 5 consolidated cases
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT.
Argued: June 7, 2000. Decided: November 30, 2000.
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently July 2009
Relies on Terry Belk
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2000-11-30
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
NOTE: THE COURT HAS VACATED THIS OPINION. SEE OPINION AT 269 F.3d 305.