Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 233 F.3d 382 - Jahn v. Equine Services, PSC

Jahn v. Equine Services, PSC’s Empirical Analysis

233 F.3d 382 · 2000

Citation profile

78
cited by 78 later decisions
3
states following
January 2025
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 3 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 78 later decisions — most recently January 2025 · most notably In re Scrap Metal Antitrust Litigation (2008), Conwood Company Lp

16 federal appellate · 3 district · 6 state decisions

400200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Kumho Tire Company, Ltd., et al. v. Patrick Carmichael, Etc., et al. · General Electric Co. v. Joiner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he Court explained that Rule 702 displays a liberal thrust with the general approach of relaxing the traditional barriers to opinion testimony”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The fact that several possible causes might remain uneliminated ... only goes to the accuracy of the conclusion, not to the soundness of the methodology.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[i]n order to be admissible on the issue of causation, an expert's testimony need not eliminate all other possible causes of the injury.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.