Gutierrez v. Schomig’s Empirical Analysis
233 F.3d 490 · 2000
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Lindh v. Murphy · Lindh v. Murphy · Terry Lynn Rhine v. Bobby Boone · Ott v. Johnson · Isham v. Randle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a properly filed application for State post-conviction or other collateral review with respect to the pertinent judgment or claim is pending.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the date on which the judgment became final by the conclusion of direct review or the expiration of the time for seeking such review.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[b]ecause [petitioner] never filed a petition for certiorari review in the Supreme Court, his potential certiorari petition was never `properly filed.' When Congress intended to exclude from the limitations period time during which a pleading could have been filed, it did so explicitly. See, e.g., [28 U.S.C.] § 2244(d)(1)(A).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gildon v. Bowen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.