Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 233 F.3d 955 - Ibt v. F

Ibt v. F’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
July 2022
most recently cited

3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently July 2022 · most notably Dalles Irrigation District v. United States (2010), 136 Cal. App. 4th 1279 - Harman v. City and County of San Francisco (2006)

3 district · 1 state decisions

140200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Farrar v. Hobby · City of Riverside v. Rivera · Marek v. Chesny · Allied Chemical & Alkali Workers of America, Local Union No. 1 v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[s]ubstantial settlement offers should be considered by the district court as a factor in determining an award of reasonable attorney's fees.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “what percentage of ownership is necessary before Svec is considered a principal owner under the CBA. Svec claims that ten percent ownership is sufficient, but Moriarty has an opportunity on remand to show that this figure is incorrect.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “In any action under this subchapter . . . in which a judgment in favor of the plan is awarded, the court shall award the plan — reasonable attorney's fees and costs of the action, to be paid by the defendant[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.