Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 233 FRD 542 - In re ATM Fee Antitrust Litigation

In re ATM Fee Antitrust Litigation’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1841 (§ 2 of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956) · 28 U.S.C. § 636

Relies on Celestine v. Blackburn · Chaveriat v. Williams Pipe Line Co. · Citric Acid Litigation 7-Up Bottling Coof Jasper Inc Varni Brothers Corp 7-Up Bottling Company of Philadelphia Inc v. Archer Daniels Midland Co Inc Cargill Inc · Searock v. Stripling · Roesberg v. Johns-Manville Corp.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.