Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 233 FRD 687 - Leathers v. Pfizer, Inc.

Leathers v. Pfizer, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
April 2016
most recently cited

3 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Gregory Lumber Co. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he statin side effect recognized in the medical community is a temporary one that ends when the patient stops taking the drug. Plaintiff attempts to extrapolate this temporary side effect to establish general causation of a much more serious, permanent illness. However, Daubert decisions “warn against leaping from an accepted scientific premise to an unsupported one.” (citation omitted).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “After this, therefore because of this.” Black’s Law Dictionary 1205 (8th ed. 2004) (defining”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.