Raymond v. Anthony Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1964
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1400 · 28 U.S.C. § 1406
Relies on Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United States · Frene v. Louisville Cement Co. · Mueller Brass Co. v. Alexander Milburn Co. · Collins v. New York Central System · Traher v. De Havilland Aircraft of Canada, Ltd.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““the defendant herein is doing business in the District of Columbia under the standard of solicitation plus maintaining regular business activities as established in Frene, et al. v. Louisville Cement Co., 77 U.S.App.D.C. 129 , 134 F.2d 511 , 146 A.L.R. 926 (1943).” ( 233 F.Supp. at 306 )”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.