Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 233 FSUPP 925 - Smith v. Enochs

Smith v. Enochs’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 1988
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on National Refining Co. v. United States · 45 F. Supp. 664 - United States v. Rosebush · Fowler v. McCartney · Martin v. Russell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “III. Ordinarily, the word purchaser has two well defined meanings. It may be employed in the broad sense to include anyone who obtains title otherwise than by descent and distribution. In its more commonly used and ordinarily accepted sense it refers to a vendee or buyer who has purchased property for a valuable consideration.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.