233 F. Supp. 2d 1 - Strategy Source, Inc. v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Relationships
Applies 17 U.S.C. § 111 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 17 U.S.C. § 410 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 17 U.S.C. § 411 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 17 U.S.C. § 502 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976)
Relies on Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination Unit · Schuler v. United States · Kregos v. Associated Press · Apple Barrel Productions, Inc. v. Beard · Sinclair v. Kleindienst
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In any case, however, where the deposit, application, and fee required for registration have been delivered to the Copyright Office in proper form and registration has been refused, the applicant is entitled to institute a civil action for infringement if notice thereof, with a copy of the complaint, is served on the Register of Copyrights.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The effective date of a copyright registration is the day on which an application, deposit, and fee, which are later determined by the Register of Copyrights or by a court of competent jurisdiction to be acceptable for registration, have all been received in the Copyright Office.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“When a copyright owner has established a threat of continuing infringement, the owner is entitled to an injunction regardless of registration.”); Apple Barrel Productions, Inc. v. Beard, 730 F.2d 384, 386 (5th Cir.1984) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.