Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 233 FSUPP3D 181 - United States v. Talbott

United States v. Talbott’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
April 2019
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Nix v. Whiteside · Molina-Martinez v. United States · CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Easterwood · Reed v. Drummond

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]his Court "need not determine whether counsel's performance was deficient before examining the prejudice suffered by the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.