Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 233 FSUPP3D 799 - Fitbit, Inc. v. AliphCom

Fitbit, Inc. v. AliphCom’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
December 2017
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 35 U.S.C. § 101

Relies on Diamond v. Diehr · Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank Int'l · Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. · Bilski v. Kappos · Bilski v. Kappos

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The various steps of transmitting or receiving information and how they are accomplished are also generic-the claims recite these steps only functionally and require no inventive algorithm or data structure for performing them.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.